Named responsibility
Articles show a named author wherever possible. The author page explains the person’s relationship to DMGO and links their published work.
Editorial policy
Useful information, accountable publishing
These are the standards DMGO applies to educational content, product guidance and commercial comparisons. They are designed to keep the work honest, current and clear about our relationship to the product.
Useful before promotional
Educational pages should answer the reader’s question first. Product links are added where they are a relevant next step, not as a substitute for an answer.
Source preference
For platform rules and product facts, we prefer primary sources such as Meta documentation and official vendor pages. Claims that can change should be dated or qualified.
No invented proof
We do not publish fabricated testimonials, ratings, customer outcomes, credentials or keyword metrics. Real case studies require permission and supporting evidence.
Updates and corrections
Important factual changes should be reflected in the page and, where appropriate, its visible reviewed or modified date. Readers can report a correction through our contact page.
Automation with human accountability
Software may assist research, structure or editing, but DMGO remains responsible for what is published. Sensitive facts and commercial comparisons require a human check against available sources.
Commercial disclosure
DMGO publishes content about the category in which it operates and may recommend DMGO where it is a suitable option. Comparison pages must also explain when another tool may be a better fit. Read our comparison methodology for the detailed process.